Beyond Trajectory Rewards: Step-level Credit Assignment for Agentic Search via Graph Modeling

In Agentic Search, trajectory-level outcome rewards fail to quantify the behavioral contributions of individual steps, while existing step-level reward methods typically rely on costly tree sampling. We view world knowledge as a latent world graph and each IS task as search within a latent task graph, where effective steps should make graph progress toward the answer node. Based on this prior, we propose Graph-Distance Contribution Reward (GDCR), a step-level process reward that scores newly-retrieved and newly-cited entities by their distance to the answer node in a training-time Entity-Relation (ER) graph. We further propose Step Advantage Policy Optimization (SAPO), which converts GDCR into step-level advantages and combines them with trajectory-level outcome advantages. Experiments on four challenging benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our method.

CSI-JEPA: Towards Foundation Representations for Ubiquitous Sensing with Minimal Supervision

Channel state information (CSI) provides a widely available sensing modality for human and environment perception, but existing CSI sensing models usually rely on task-specific supervised training and require substantial labeled data for each task, device, user, or environment. This limits their scalability in practical deployments where unlabeled CSI is abundant but labeled data is costly to collect. In this paper, we present CSI-JEPA, a self-supervised predictive representation learning framework for label-efficient, multi-task Wi-Fi sensing. CSI-JEPA learns reusable temporal-spectral representations from unlabeled CSI samples by predicting latent features of masked channel regions from visible context. To better match the physical structure of CSI, CSI-JEPA tokenizes channel-response amplitude windows along the time and subcarrier dimensions. It then introduces a channel variation-aware masking strategy that samples predictive targets from regions with stronger local temporal and subcarrier-domain variations. After pretraining, the encoder is frozen and used as a backbone, with lightweight task-specific adapters added for downstream sensing tasks. We evaluate CSI-JEPA on seven real-world Wi-Fi sensing tasks spanning diverse objectives and deployment settings. The results show that CSI-JEPA improves downstream sensing performance over competitive baselines, achieving up to 10.64 percentage points mean accuracy gain over state-of-the-art supervised Transformer and matched-budget label savings of up to 98.0%.

SciVQR: A Multidisciplinary Multimodal Benchmark for Advanced Scientific Reasoning Evaluation

Scientific reasoning is a key aspect of human intelligence, requiring the integration of multimodal inputs, domain expertise, and multi-step inference across various subjects. Existing benchmarks for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often fail to capture the complexity and traceability of reasoning processes necessary for rigorous evaluation. To fill this gap, we introduce SciVQR, a multimodal benchmark covering 54 subfields in mathematics, physics, chemistry, geography, astronomy, and biology. SciVQR includes domain-specific visuals, such as equations, charts, and diagrams, and challenges models to combine visual comprehension with reasoning. The tasks range from basic factual recall to complex, multi-step inferences, with 46% including expert-authored solutions. SciVQR not only evaluates final answers but also examines the reasoning process, providing insights into how models reach their conclusions. Our evaluation of leading MLLMs, including both proprietary and open-source models, reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal reasoning tasks, underscoring the need for improved multi-step reasoning and better integration of interdisciplinary knowledge in advancing MLLMs toward true scientific intelligence. The dataset and evaluation code are publicly available at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/SciVQR.

TRACER: Verifiable Generative Provenance for Multimodal Tool-Using Agents

Multimodal large language models increasingly solve vision-centric tasks by calling external tools for visual inspection, OCR, retrieval, calculation, and multi-step reasoning. Current tool-using agents usually expose the executed tool trajectory and the final answer, but they rarely specify which tool observation supports each generated claim. We call this missing claim-level dependency structure the provenance gap. The gap makes tool use hard to verify and hard to optimize, because useful evidence, redundant exploration, and unsupported reasoning are mixed in the same trajectory. We introduce TRACER, a framework for verifiable generative provenance in multimodal tool-using agents. Instead of adding citations after generation, TRACER generates each answer sentence together with a structured provenance record that identifies the supporting tool turn, evidence unit, and semantic support relation. Its relation space contains Quotation, Compression, and Inference, covering direct reuse, faithful condensation, and grounded derivation. TRACER verifies each record through schema checking, tool-turn alignment, source authenticity, and relation rationality, and then converts verified provenance into traceability constraints and provenance-derived local credit for reinforcement learning. We further construct TRACE-Bench, a benchmark for sentence-level provenance reconstruction from coarse multimodal tool trajectories. On TRACE-Bench, simply adding tools often introduces noise. With Qwen3-VL-8B, TRACER reaches 78.23% answer accuracy and 95.72% summary accuracy, outperforming the strongest closed-source tool-augmented baseline by 23.80 percentage points. Compared with tool-only supervised fine-tuning, it also reduces total test-set tool calls from 4949 to 3486. These results show that reliable multimodal tool reasoning depends on provenance-aware use of observations, not on more tool calls alone.

M$^3$-VQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal, Multi-Entity, Multi-Hop Visual Question Answering

We present M$^3$-VQA, a novel knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmark, to enhance the evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in fine-grained multimodal entity understanding and complex multi-hop reasoning. Unlike existing VQA datasets that focus on coarse-grained categories and simple reasoning over single entities, M$^3$-VQA introduces diverse multi-entity questions involving multiple distinct entities from both visual and textual sources. It requires models to perform both sequential and parallel multi-hop reasoning across multiple documents, supported by traceable, detailed evidence and a curated multimodal knowledge base. We evaluate 16 leading MLLMs under three settings: without external knowledge, with gold evidence, and with retrieval-augmented input. The poor results reveal significant challenges for MLLMs in knowledge acquisition and reasoning. Models perform poorly without external information but improve markedly when provided with precise evidence. Furthermore, reasoning-aware agentic retrieval surpasses heuristic methods, highlighting the importance of structured reasoning for complex multimodal understanding. M$^3$-VQA presents a more challenging evaluation for advancing the multimodal reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/M3VQA.

When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?

The volume of scientific submissions continues to climb, outpacing the capacity of qualified human referees and stretching editorial timelines. At the same time, modern large language models (LLMs) offer impressive capabilities in summarization, fact checking, and literature triage, making the integration of AI into peer review increasingly attractive -- and, in practice, unavoidable. Yet early deployments and informal adoption have exposed acute failure modes. Recent incidents have revealed that hidden prompt injections embedded in manuscripts can steer LLM-generated reviews toward unjustifiably positive judgments. Complementary studies have also demonstrated brittleness to adversarial phrasing, authority and length biases, and hallucinated claims. These episodes raise a central question for scholarly communication: when AI reviews science, can we trust the AI referee? This paper provides a security- and reliability-centered analysis of AI peer review. We map attacks across the review lifecycle -- training and data retrieval, desk review, deep review, rebuttal, and system-level. We instantiate this taxonomy with four treatment-control probes on a stratified set of ICLR 2025 submissions, using two advanced LLM-based referees to isolate the causal effects of prestige framing, assertion strength, rebuttal sycophancy, and contextual poisoning on review scores. Together, this taxonomy and experimental audit provide an evidence-based baseline for assessing and tracking the reliability of AI peer review and highlight concrete failure points to guide targeted, testable mitigations.

RoboWM-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Models in Robotic Manipulation

Recent advances in large-scale video world models have enabled increasingly realistic future prediction, raising the prospect of leveraging imagined videos for robot learning. However, visual realism does not imply physical plausibility, and behaviors inferred from generated videos may violate dynamics and fail when executed by embodied agents. Existing benchmarks begin to incorporate notions of physical plausibility, but they largely remain perception- or diagnostic-oriented and do not systematically evaluate whether predicted behaviors can be translated into executable actions that complete the intended task. To address this gap, we introduce RoboWM-Bench, a manipulation-centric benchmark for embodiment-grounded evaluation of video world models. RoboWM-Bench converts generated behaviors from both human-hand and robotic manipulation videos into embodied action sequences and validates them through robotic execution. The benchmark spans diverse manipulation scenarios and establishes a unified protocol for consistent and reproducible evaluation. Using RoboWM-Bench, we evaluate state-of-the-art video world models and find that reliably generating physically executable behaviors remains an open challenge. Common failure modes include errors in spatial reasoning, unstable contact prediction, and non-physical deformations. While finetuning on manipulation data yields improvements, physical inconsistencies still persist, suggesting opportunities for more physically grounded video generation for robots.

Weakly-supervised Learning for Physics-informed Neural Motion Planning via Sparse Roadmap

The motion planning problem requires finding a collision-free path between start and goal configurations in high-dimensional, cluttered spaces. Recent learning-based methods offer promising solutions, with self-supervised physics-informed approaches such as Neural Time Fields (NTFields) solving the Eikonal equation to learn value functions without expert demonstrations. However, existing physics-informed methods struggle to scale in complex, multi-room environments, where simply increasing the number of samples cannot resolve local minima or guarantee global consistency. We propose Hierarchical Neural Time Fields (H-NTFields), a weakly-supervised framework that combines weak supervision from sparse roadmaps with physics-informed PDE regularization. The roadmap provides global topological anchors through upper and lower bounds on travel times, while PDE losses enforce local geometric fidelity and obstacle-aware propagation. Experiments on 18 Gibson environments and real robotic platforms show that H-NTFields substantially improves robustness over prior physics-informed methods, while enabling fast amortized inference through a continuous value representation.

ProUIE: A Macro-to-Micro Progressive Learning Method for LLM-based Universal Information Extraction

LLM-based universal information extraction (UIE) methods often rely on additional information beyond the original training data, which increases training complexity yet often yields limited gains. To address this, we propose ProUIE, a Macro-to-Micro progressive learning approach that improves UIE without introducing any external information. ProUIE consists of three stages: (i) macro-level Complete Modeling (CM), which learns NER, RE, and EE along their intrinsic difficulty order on the full training data to build a unified extraction foundation, (ii) meso-level Streamlined Alignment (SA), which operates on sampled data with simplified target formats, streamlining and regularizing structured outputs to make them more concise and controllable, and (iii) micro-level Deep Exploration (DE), which applies GRPO with stepwise fine-grained rewards (SFR) over structural units to guide exploration and improve performance. Experiments on 36 public datasets show that ProUIE consistently improves unified extraction, outperforming strong instruction-tuned baselines on average for NER and RE while using a smaller backbone, and it further demonstrates clear gains in large-scale production-oriented information extraction.

FactReview: Evidence-Grounded Reviews with Literature Positioning and Execution-Based Claim Verification

Peer review in machine learning is under growing pressure from rising submission volume and limited reviewer time. Most LLM-based reviewing systems read only the manuscript and generate comments from the paper's own narrative. This makes their outputs sensitive to presentation quality and leaves them weak when the evidence needed for review lies in related work or released code. We present FactReview, an evidence-grounded reviewing system that combines claim extraction, literature positioning, and execution-based claim verification. Given a submission, FactReview identifies major claims and reported results, retrieves nearby work to clarify the paper's technical position, and, when code is available, executes the released repository under bounded budgets to test central empirical claims. It then produces a concise review and an evidence report that assigns each major claim one of five labels: Supported, Supported by the paper, Partially supported, In conflict, or Inconclusive. In a case study on CompGCN, FactReview reproduces results that closely match those reported for link prediction and node classification, yet also shows that the paper's broader performance claim across tasks is not fully sustained: on MUTAG graph classification, the reproduced result is 88.4%, whereas the strongest baseline reported in the paper remains 92.6%. The claim is therefore only partially supported. More broadly, this case suggests that AI is most useful in peer review not as a final decision-maker, but as a tool for gathering evidence and helping reviewers produce more evidence-grounded assessments. The code is public at https://github.com/DEFENSE-SEU/Review-Assistant.